ARRI DigitalGeneral CategoryGeneral DiscussionVirgin Question
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: Virgin Question  (Read 438 times)
unsignedRus
Newbie
*
Posts: 1


« on: October 20, 2012, 02:10:35 PM »

Please be gentle. I'm new. LA-based Londoner.

I'm planning to shoot a feature in London.
I'm aiming for the Ninth Gate/Eyes Wide Shut look.

What's the minimal crew for a 30-day shoot?
I'm hoping to raise £300,000 ($480K) or am I dreaming and is this
way too little and I should stick to my silly AF100 on a paltry
budget like that?

Here's what I'm thinking personnel wise:

DoP, DIT
Gaffer Lighting Department
Camera Operator
Focus Puller
Set Decorator
Production Sound
Hair/Make Up
Wardrobe
Production Manager
Line Producer
Location Scout.
Script Supervisor
First AD
Second AD
Catering & Craft Services
Logged

ChrisSmith
Newbie
*
Posts: 32



« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2012, 07:52:38 AM »

Really it's all over the board.  I shot my first feature in 1998 with $18k, 30 rolls of film and an Aaton LTR.  I had 2 crew members, myself and a kid I found to hold a boom and start and stop the DAT.  That ended up winning the one festival I entered it in.  So, my point is, I would think less in terms of being concerned with what is standard and more in terms of what you can get away with for the vision you want.  Me personally, I would rather have an Alexa and a few dudes on a crew than a bad camera and a lot of dudes.  (I assume you want to shoot Alexa as you are at an Alexa forum).  I spent half my budget on shooting film at the time even though I had my dad's free Betacam to use.  I know there are exceptions to the rule where there has been great work with "cheap" cams, but personally, I can't stand doing all the work to build a story and execute the plan only to go to a less than ideal image capture device.

My second piece of advice is you'll probably get way more feedback at a filmmaking or cinematography forum than one about a specific camera Wink
Logged

Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to: